Evolutionists assume that the rate of cosmic bombardment of the atmosphere has always remained constant and that the rate of decay has remained constant.
Whenever the worldview of evolution is questioned, the topic of carbon dating always comes up.
Is carbon dating applied to the Qur'anic manuscripts.
Can radiocarbon dating provide more accurate results than traditional palaeographic techniques and associated methods?
I don't think what the newest edition is, but as far as I narrative carbon dating is virtually identical.
This energy converts about 21 pounds of nitrogen into radioactive carbon This radioactive carbon 14 slowly decays back into normal, stable nitrogen.
Extensive laboratory testing has shown that about half of the C molecules will decay in 5, years. It is perhaps one of the most widely used and best known absolute dating methods and has become an indispensable part of an archaeologist's tool-kit.
Carbon 14 is used for this example: The above is offered as a simple fact of research.
Knowing how faulty creationist "facts" can be, let's do a little research of our own.